麻豆精品

Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for 麻豆精品 Newsletter

In New York City, thousands of students deemed 鈥済ifted鈥� by the Department of Education鈥檚 own assessment standards are denied access to gifted and talented public school programs due to the lack of available seats. 

Their parents are desperate for options when it comes to accommodating children capable of doing above grade-level work. In a city of close to 1 million students, where, in some neighborhoods, half are scoring in the top 10th percentile on IQ tests, that equals thousands of underserved kids.

Several states, including Alabama, Kansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Washington and West Virginia, offer an . A few more, like Arizona, Florida and Kentucky, have a variation, like an Individual Service Plan or a Gifted Student Service Plan.

I asked subscribers to my whether they would support a situation like the one currently available in , where giftedness is bundled under special education and all students who qualify receive an IEP.

Provisions of this law include:

• “Special education” means the following: Specially designed instruction, at no cost to the parents, to meet the unique needs of an exceptional child

• Each gifted child shall be permitted to test out of, or work at an individual rate, and receive credit for required or prerequisite courses, or both, at all grade levels, if so specified in that child鈥檚 individualized education program. Any gifted child may receive credit for college study at the college or high school level, or both. If a gifted child chooses to receive college credit, however, the student shall be responsible for the college tuition costs.

This arrangement would have been particularly useful for my family and might have kept my middle child from dropping out of high school when he wasn鈥檛 allowed to take the higher-level classes he wanted. I tried to enroll him in college but hit a bureaucratic wall when they wouldn鈥檛 accept him without a high school diploma, even though he scored higher on standardized tests than the average student the college accepted.

The majority of my fellow NYC parents were in favor of a similar statute for New York state.

鈥淎bsolutely! This is so necessary,鈥� cheered mother of three Laura B. 鈥淕ifted children definitely have special needs and they should be educated at the level they deserve. I fully support a bill like this for NYC.鈥� 

鈥淚t would be amazing if public school could provide material at [gifted kids鈥橾 level,鈥� sighed A.K. a mother of two, 鈥渋nstead of the cookie-cutter curriculum they shove down the throats of all students.鈥�

Elaine Daly, parent, social worker and school counselor, did express concerns about how these children would be identified. 鈥淲ould [the IEP assessment] be designed with the understanding that traditional tests are not the only standard of gifted?鈥�

A lack of qualified teachers is what worries mom Iona Baldini. 鈥淚鈥檓 concerned that schools don鈥檛 have teachers who can work with gifted kids. There are very few teachers that can meet gifted kids at their level. I think we need infrastructure and a different mindset to teach gifted students.鈥�

Gayle Doyle, a one-time gifted child herself, isn鈥檛 concerned. 鈥淧art of being gifted means that you are challenging and learning yourself. In fourth grade, our class implemented a 鈥渢est out鈥� for math. You took the test before the unit, and if you scored above a certain level, you didn鈥檛 have to go through that lesson and were given more advanced work to do independently. I tested out of all the units. I was able to go into the hallway during math lessons where I worked on more challenging math problems. It was completely self-led, the teachers only had to provide problems for me to work on, but there was no instruction. I found it better this way, and this was done a while ago without IEPs.鈥�

Finally, a parent who asked to be identified as KC sees another bright side to offering IEPs for gifted kids. 鈥淭here is a lot of prejudice against kids with an IEP by other parents. The number of times I鈥檝e heard them complain about having their “gen ed” kid being in a class with an IEP kid (like mine) is too disappointing to list. That鈥檚 because there鈥檚 an assumption that IEP always means my kids have a negative trait that will ‘hold their [kid] back.’ A law like this *might* help these parents realize that there are equally deserving IEP students who should have their skills nurtured.鈥�

Assessing students and implementing individualized education plans is an expense few school districts, especially NYC, which is losing enrollment 鈥� and thus funding 鈥� can afford. An obvious, cost-effective solution would be to offer a higher-level curriculum for all. This across the board upgrade should be enough for most of those currently considered 鈥渁dvanced.鈥� But pleas to that effect have fallen on deaf ears for decades. The curriculum is, instead, dumbed down, most recently with the as a graduation requirement. 

If the only way parents can get an appropriate education for their academically gifted child is by demanding the same “” currently only available to those classified as “” by the U.S. Department of Education, then that鈥檚 what they may need to resort to. I realize it would put extra strain on an already overtaxed system, and it would cost more. I would rather not go that route. It鈥檚 the worst possible option for everyone, families and schools, in terms of expense and effort. But it feels like NYC parents have been left with no alternatives.

Get stories like these delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for 麻豆精品 Newsletter