麻豆精品

Explore

Standard-Based Grading Offers a Different Model of Assessing Student Learning

Jerrid Kruse: Instead of focusing on student behaviors, standards-based grading assesses if students are actually learning what鈥檚 being taught.

Students do their classwork in Greta Peacock’s science class at Yellowstone Schools in Houston, Tuesday, Jan. 20. (Brett Coomer/Houston Chronicle via Getty Images)

Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for 麻豆精品 Newsletter

Some school districts, including ones in Maine, New Mexico, and , are shifting to standards-based grading, where students are graded on the skills and concepts they learn instead of points accumulated from assignments and tests throughout the school year.

, a professor of education at , studies how people learn and teach science, and standards-based grading is one aspect of this work.

Jerrid Kruse discusses the differences between standards-based grading and traditional grading in K-12 classrooms.

The Conversation has collaborated with SciLine to bring you highlights from the discussion, edited for brevity and clarity.

What is standards-based grading, and how is it different from traditional grading?

Jerrid Kruse: The main thrust of is really an increased transparency between what teachers are teaching and how they are assessing their students.

I think when most people think of , they think of accumulating points or making deposits like in a banking model, where if I turn in the homework every day, I get 5 points. And I keep building those points up so that even if I do poorly on a test, I still end up with a B in the class, even though I may have gotten a C or even lower on a test.

is a shift away from that. Instead of focusing on student behaviors, such as completing homework and showing up to class on time, standards-based grading focuses on if the student is actually learning the things we鈥檙e trying to teach them.

How exactly does it impact student learning?

Kruse: If teachers can assess student learning more transparently, then teachers have about what students do and do not know, and students also have more information about what they themselves do and do not know. Then teachers and students can act on that information; that鈥檚 the key.

We cannot expect standards-based grading to magically fix the teaching and the learning that鈥檚 happening in the classroom. Instead, what it does is provide a more transparent assessment of to what extent the learning is happening in the classroom. And then it鈥檚 up to the teachers and the students to act on that information.

So the student can go home and study the particular things that they鈥檙e having trouble with, and the teachers can say, 鈥淥K, my class is really struggling with standard number 4, so let鈥檚 spend some more time on standard number 4.鈥 It鈥檚 really about what teachers and students do with that information.

What are some of the challenges?

Kruse: One of the big things is . Top-down initiatives oftentimes end up with really poor implementation or superficial implementation. In my experience, the best standards-based grading efforts have come from the teachers themselves rather than from an administrator. So I think it鈥檚 important to spend time getting teacher buy-in and maybe even making it optional at first to let it be more of a grassroots effort.

Another challenge for teachers is identifying the key standards. So rather than thinking, 鈥淥kay, I鈥檓 going to teach Chapter 3,鈥 it鈥檚 shifting that thinking to: 鈥淲hat is the thing or concept that I want students to learn out of Chapter 3?鈥 From there, they can better communicate that to students.

Also, what will the report card look like? Are we going to continue to report A, B, C, D and F grades? Are we going to report all of the standards? These are questions teachers and school administrators need to decide together.

Then finally, in terms of helping parents and students understand why a school might move to standards-based grading, I suggest leaning into the transparency piece. The goal is more communication and more accurate communication between schools and kids and parents. That鈥檚 going to be a key piece for any district considering this.

Why should people care?

Kruse: Grades are a consistent source of struggle for students. For some kids, it鈥檚 really about how we can help them be less concerned about the grade and more concerned about the learning. And so standards-based grading can help push in that direction.

And then on the other side, we have kids who have been underserved by traditional education, and a standards-based approach can help these kids see school as something that they can do because they can see incremental progress on the standards rather than just a C or other letter grade. It鈥檚 the difference between 鈥淚 got a C,鈥 and 鈥淚 got a C, and these are the three standards that I need to work on.鈥

I think it helps all students, including high achievers and traditionally low achievers, but in different ways.

is a free service based at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, a nonprofit that helps journalists include scientific evidence and experts in their news stories.

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .

Did you use this article in your work?

We鈥檇 love to hear how 麻豆精品鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.

Republish This Article

We want our stories to be shared as widely as possible 鈥 for free.

Please view 麻豆精品's republishing terms.





On 麻豆精品 Today