麻豆精品

Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for 麻豆精品 Newsletter

Oklahoma was poised next month to be the first state to allow a religious charter school. But whether a state board still votes on the application is up in the air in light of the new attorney general鈥檚 opinion on the matter. 

Attorney General Gentner Drummond last week withdrew his predecessor鈥檚 supporting an application for a Catholic virtual charter school, saying he was uncomfortable advising the charter board to violate the state constitution鈥檚 ban on funding religious schools. Approval of such a school could 鈥渃reate a slippery slope鈥� and require the state to spend public dollars on charter schools 鈥渨hose tenets are diametrically opposed鈥� to the beliefs of many Oklahomans, to Rebecca Wilkinson, executive director of the Statewide Virtual Charter School Board. 

Wilkinson had no comment on the withdrawal of the opinion. But Brett Farley, executive director of the Catholic Conference of Oklahoma, a policy organization, said representatives from the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City plan to meet with her before the board鈥檚 March 14 board meeting to discuss 鈥減rocedural questions.鈥�

Gov. Kevin Stitt and state Superintendent Ryan Walters disagree with Drummond’s suggestion that the ultimate authority on whether the state can allow a religious charter school is the U.S. Supreme Court. The justices are considering whether to hear a 4th Circuit Court of Appeals case that focuses on whether charter schools are public or private. Drummond said he hopes they do. In the meantime, even if the state’s virtual charter board approves the application, a legal challenge is likely to follow.

鈥淲e would certainly give very serious consideration to filing litigation if the application is approved, in consultation with affected Oklahoma taxpayers, parents, educators and others,鈥� Alex Luchenitser, associate vice president and associate legal director at Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said in an email to 麻豆精品.

Kenneth Upton, Americans United鈥檚 senior litigation counsel, urged the charter board during its Feb. 14 meeting to reject the application for St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School. As public schools, he said, charters are subject to the First Amendment and, therefore, must 鈥渂e neutral on issues of religion.鈥�

He summarized the question raised in , the 4th Circuit case from North Carolina. 

In that case, the that charter schools act on behalf of the state, just like traditional schools. But the Leland, North Carolina, charter school argues that because it鈥檚 a nonprofit, it should have the flexibility to adopt a dress code requiring girls to wear skirts. Families sued over the rule, saying it violated girls鈥� civil rights.

鈥淓ven if charter schools were private entities instead of public schools, they still are state actors under U.S. Supreme Court precedent,鈥� Upton said.

That means, he said, that charters can鈥檛 teach religion, sponsor prayer, discriminate based on religion or require students to take part in religious activities. 

The Supreme Court is waiting on the Biden administration鈥檚 opinion on the case before deciding whether to hear it. To Aaron Streett, Charter Day School’s attorney, that鈥檚 encouraging.

鈥淚t indicates that the court views this as an important case that may merit further review,鈥� he said. 鈥淕iven that the court denies 99% of petitions outright, the court鈥檚 expression of interest here is a positive sign.鈥�

filed an amicus brief stressing the gravity of the decision before the court.

鈥淭he question presented in this case 鈥� warrants this court鈥檚 attention because it may dictate whether such schools can continue to exist,鈥� they wrote. 

The opinion from U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar is expected in the spring.

For now, it鈥檚 unclear whether the virtual charter board in Oklahoma will proceed with a vote on the archdiocese’s application. If it does, just three politically appointed board members will make the decision. Two seats are vacant.

Walters, a non-voting board member, said he believes 鈥減arents should have the choice to send their children to schools of faith.鈥�

Stitt said he stands by former Attorney General John O鈥機onnor鈥檚 December opinion, which suggested that recent Supreme Court rulings on school choice provide a legal foundation for a religious charter school.

In Friday, Stitt said he disagrees with Drummond鈥檚 interpretation of the law and 鈥�100%鈥� supports the charter application. 

鈥淚 think that’s great, just like if the Jewish community wants to set up a charter school, or the Muslim community,鈥� he said. 鈥淚’ve got friends across all walks of faith.鈥�

Did you use this article in your work?

We鈥檇 love to hear how 麻豆精品鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.