麻豆精品

Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for 麻豆精品 Newsletter

Attorneys representing a group of New Jersey parents and activist groups are asking a state appellate court to weigh in on a case that could reshape the state鈥檚 public education system.

At the center of the fight is whether New Jersey schools are unconstitutionally segregated by race and socioeconomic status. A lower court judge in October 2023 acknowledged the state鈥檚 public schools are segregated by race and that the state must act, but also found that the plaintiffs had failed to prove the entire system is segregated across all its districts.

The parents鈥� attorneys asking it to hear the case.

鈥淚t is imperative that no more students be deprived of these rights by the trial court鈥檚 avoidance of the straightforward conclusion compelled by the facts and the law in this case 鈥� that the state defendants, who are legally obligated to take action to desegregate public schools regardless of the reasons for that segregation, have acted unconstitutionally by failing to do so,鈥� the attorneys wrote in the filing.

Gov. Phil Murphy and the state Department of Education have until April 28 to respond to the plaintiffs鈥� new filing. A spokesman for the Murphy administration declined to comment.

News of the new filing was .

The case dates to 2018, when the Latino Action Network, the NAACP New Jersey State Conference, and several other families and groups聽聽alleging New Jersey failed to address de facto segregation in public schools. The plaintiffs聽聽attend schools that are more than 90% non-white, in districts that are often just blocks from predominantly white districts.

In New Jersey, students typically attend schools in the municipality where they live. Plaintiffs argued that long-standing housing policies that led to segregated residential neighborhoods led to segregated schools also. New Jersey is the seventh-most segregated state for Black and Latino students, the plaintiffs say.

聽after Superior Court Judge Robert Lougy issued his ruling that acknowledged racial segregation in New Jersey schools but said it was not widespread, both sides entered mediation talks in hopes it would resolve more quickly than continued litigation.

Attorneys for the parties said聽 that it鈥檚 unlikely continuing the talks would 鈥渂e constructive.鈥�

The plaintiffs鈥� attorneys say the lower court鈥檚 October ruling should be reversed. They want a judge to review what they say are six errors in the 2023 order, like the fact that Lougy did not identify a disputed fact.

鈥淩ather than reach the only logical conclusion that followed 鈥� that the state defendants violated plaintiffs鈥� constitutional rights 鈥� the trial court left the question of liability for another day,鈥� the filing reads.

If the appellate court denies the motion, the case would return to the trial court, or could be appealed to the state Supreme Court.

is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. New Jersey Monitor maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Terrence T. McDonald for questions: [email protected].

Did you use this article in your work?

We鈥檇 love to hear how 麻豆精品鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.