麻豆精品

Updated Aug. 18

Educators in the United States spend $13 billion annually on ed tech but have no way to collectively track the success of those technology tools. That鈥檚 why the EdTech Evidence Exchange, part of the University of Virginia, has launched the EdTech Genome Project 鈥� to create a framework to give K-12 school and district decision makers a tool for making more informed choices when it comes to purchasing and implementing classroom technology.

The project, which began late last year, includes a 27-member advisory board of academic researchers, educators, technology investors, union leaders and representatives of philanthropic organizations. 鈥淭here鈥檚 nothing more powerful than an accomplished teacher with access to the best tools,鈥� says Peggy Brookins, CEO of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards and an advisory board member. 鈥淔or too long, though, educators and school leaders have operated without a clear framework to understand how best to choose and implement technology that fits in the classroom and actually elevates great teaching and learning.鈥�

Project leader Bart Epstein, president and CEO of the EdTech Evidence Exchange and a research associate professor at the University of Virginia Curry School of Education and Human Development, says the effort is more important now than ever. 鈥淭he impact of COVID-19 on schools has made the work of the EdTech Genome Project more critical,鈥� he says. 鈥淭his fall, even if schools completely reopen and stay open, and all students and teachers return, it will likely be impossible for educators to teach an entire year鈥檚 worth of new material while simultaneously catching up huge numbers of students who will have gone six months without a single lesson.鈥�

Epstein says the effective use of education technology represents one of the few possibilities for saving these kids from being permanently left behind. 鈥淯ntil we know what works, where and why, we won鈥檛 be able to realize that potential,鈥� he says. 鈥淥nce the education sector has coalesced around the framework being created by the EdTech Genome Project, we can use it to collect data from tens of thousands of educators around the country and finally begin to learn from each other at scale.鈥�

Valerie Truesdale, assistant executive director for The School Superintendents Association, says the project鈥檚 ultimate goal is to create a toolkit for educators. 鈥淔or some systems, it can come down to, 鈥業 want to buy this package because I like the salesperson,鈥欌�� she says. 鈥淓ducators, instructional material software companies, publishers, hardware manufacturers and resellers would benefit from access to better understanding of what educational technology, systems combinations and implementation plans work, where they work and why they work.鈥�

For this year, project staff hope to make headway on establishing a list of variables 鈥� from cost and how long the technology takes to learn to how well it aligns with curricular standards and teachers鈥� attitudes toward tech in the classroom 鈥� that might influence a successful ed tech experience.

鈥淭he bottom line is finding what is helping students learn,鈥� Truesdale says. 鈥淗ow do you know this or that instructional material is going to work? There is really no guidebook. Whether a small or large district, there is no guidebook and it is an expensive undertaking to figure it out.鈥�

Tom Kane, Walter H. Gale professor of education and economics at the Harvard Graduate School of Education and an advisory board member, says he believes the project can help identify the classroom-level factors that determine whether or not teachers even use products.

鈥淥nce we know there is a tool districts could use to decide if a particular product is a good match for their classroom teachers, procedures and instructional style, that is useful for future research,鈥� he says. 鈥淭he tangible result I hope to see is a survey tool that software providers and school districts can use for identifying which products will be well matched to which district and schools.鈥�

With support from a mix of philanthropies including the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Strada Education Network and Carnegie Corporation of New York, the project鈥檚 30-member steering committee and staff can 鈥渢ackle the field鈥檚 most pressing collective action problem,鈥� says Epstein.

Truesdale says she鈥檚 excited to see if they can pull off the 鈥渕ammoth鈥� project, with its many complexities. 鈥淚t is not a simple matter of drawing a road map and saying, 鈥楩ollow this,鈥欌�� she says. 鈥淚t is really nuanced, so I think it will be interesting to see how it shakes out.鈥�

Says Kane, 鈥淲hether it becomes the industry standard or not will be up to how easy they can make this to use and how it is administered,鈥� he says. 鈥淚 think the goal is to not just generate a measure, but a measure widely used.鈥�

Disclosure: Chan Zuckerberg Initiative and Carnegie Corporation of New York provide financial support to the EdTech Genome Project and 麻豆精品.

Did you use this article in your work?

We鈥檇 love to hear how 麻豆精品鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.