麻豆精品

A version of this essay originally appeared on the .

Will They?

On April 11, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio announced that, due to coronavirus, all for the duration of the academic year, which is scheduled to . Remote learning, however, will continue.

A few hours later, New York Gov. with the equivalent of 鈥淣ot so fast. You鈥檙e not in charge here; I鈥檓 in charge here. Nothing stays closed till I say it stays closed. And I haven鈥檛 said it stays closed yet. Not that I鈥檝e said it will reopen.鈥�

Earlier, city Schools Chancellor Richard Carranza announced that , effective immediately. Then he said Zoom would be gradually phased out. No timelines as to how or when. Then he stopped saying anything at all.

Sterling leadership all the way around.

To be fair, New York is hardly the only district struggling with how to continue teaching 鈥� and learning 鈥� in the age of mandatory social distancing. Some are debating just and calling it a day. Others from continuing with their normal course of instruction while brick-and-mortar schools were struggling to figure out how to migrate their lesson plans online. Still others have allowed teachers to and work fewer hours per day, while yet others have for students across the board due to equity concerns.

As a result of the nationwide turmoil, several proposals have been floated to have come September.

New York City, America鈥檚 largest school district, has yet to weigh in.

Can they?

The sheer logistics alone would be staggering. New York鈥檚 collectively educate more than 1.1 million children, with about 70,000 in each grade from kindergarten through 12th. (If the edict were implemented, it would be interesting to see if private schools would choose to participate. On the one hand, it would mean an extra year of tuition for them. On the other, parents might revolt and transfer. Hey, maybe New York could follow Oregon鈥檚 lead and because, you know, crisis鈥�.)

Sixth- and ninth-grade placement for September 2020 has already been announced. Tens of thousands of parents are ripping their hair out waiting to officially hear where their children have been assigned for kindergarten.

If everyone is held back, does that mean there will be no new incoming kindergarten class? (Full disclosure: Because of New York鈥檚 , I have heard from multiple parents of children with late-fall birthdays who are hoping for exactly that verdict.)

Will these children repeat pre-K? What does that mean for the 4-year-olds who were scheduled to start pre-K in September? Will pre-K balloon up to 140,000-plus students? That鈥檚 impossible. , and it certainly doesn鈥檛 have the , to accommodate all the current pre-K kids. Due to , they鈥檝e even announced a halt to rolling out 3PK in new neighborhoods. If the 5鈥檚 repeat, and the 4鈥檚 repeat, then the 3鈥檚 have to repeat, right? So no new entering 3鈥檚, either.

De Blasio has touted the miraculous benefits of universal pre-K for everything from to . (Sure, he lacks evidence of either, but why let that stop him from saying it?)

Would he deprive an entire cohort of 3- and 4-year-olds of his much-touted signature initiative?

Does this also mean high school seniors won鈥檛 graduate? Carranza is very proud of his rising graduation rates. (Sure, a good portion of students are still , but why let that stop him from being proud?) Carranza has been , 鈥淲e need to rethink the way we grade students. Maybe we should grade them on a pass/fail basis, whether they master the material or not.鈥�

So seniors will move on 鈥� while everyone else stays in place?

Should they?

But why should everyone else stay in place?

Whenever I have the gall to mention that perhaps New York City students should be , rather than how many times their bodies have swirled around the sun, I receive : Teaching multiple ability levels in a classroom is an integral part of any teacher鈥檚 education and training. Plain and simple, it鈥檚 our job.

In that case, what鈥檚 the problem?

Why not let all kids move up in grade level, whether they master the material or not? As it stands, we where only 10 percent of students perform at grade level 鈥� only 5 percent 鈥� only 2 percent 鈥� . And yet they still get promoted year after year. Why should this year be any different?

The districts that have halted remote learning due to equity concerns claim it鈥檚 unfair that some students have access to computers and workspaces while others don鈥檛. Obviously, the former will be much further ahead in September than the latter.

But if all teachers are equally skilled at teaching multiple ability levels in a classroom 鈥� it鈥檚 their job, after all 鈥� then that won鈥檛 be an insurmountable issue in September, will it?

Just like it isn鈥檛 an issue now?

Some truly radical thinkers have floated the crackpot concept of testing students prior to school resuming in September to see whether they are ready to move up in grade level or would benefit from repeating the year.

But if we were to do that for September 2020, what would be the rationale for not doing it every year moving forward, and ensuring that every student was assigned to the grade best suited for him or her, not to mention graduating from high school with the skill set necessary to succeed in the world?

Oh, never mind, I know that鈥檚 crazy talk. Can you imagine what would become of the New York City school system if anybody ever dared to do that?

Alina Adams is a New York Times best-selling romance and mystery writer, the author of Getting Into NYC Kindergarten and Getting Into NYC High School, a blogger at and mother of three. She believes you can’t have true school choice until all parents know all their school choices 鈥� and how to get them. Visit her website, .

Did you use this article in your work?

We鈥檇 love to hear how 麻豆精品鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.